Advance Researches in Civil Engineering

Advance Researches in Civil Engineering

Comparative Analysis of Embedded Beam Rows and Volume Elements in the Modeling of a Pile-Supported Bridge Pier

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Altınbaş University, 34218 Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
This study investigates the differences between modeling piles as Embedded Beam Rows and Volume Elements in supporting a pier foundation under dynamic loading. Using PLAXIS2D, the system was analyzed under uni-directional and bi-directional excitations derived from the Northridge earthquake. The results show that both modeling approaches captured the vertical load transfer mechanism; however, the foundation settlement in the Volume Element model was found to be about five times larger due to its explicit representation of pile-soil contact, allowing for soil yielding and nonlinear deformation. The Embedded Beam Row model, using simplified linear springs, produced a stiffer response and smaller settlements. Additionally, the horizontal acceleration at the tower head was higher than at the foundation, mainly due to dynamic amplification and the tower’s flexible cantilever behavior. The study highlights the strengths and limitations of each modeling technique, offering insights for future seismic analyses of pile-supported structures.
Keywords

1- M. Abdelsalam and M. Seyedi, “Numerical evaluation of pile-driving-induced vibrations in soil and their impact on adjacent structures,” J. Civ. Hydraul. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56578/jch e030103.
2- D.F. Turello, F. Pinto, and P.J. Sánchez, “Embedded beam element with interaction surface for lateral loading of piles,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40(4), 568-582, 2016.
3- C.M. Smulders, S. Hosseini, and R. Brinkgreve, “Improved embedded beam with interaction surface,” In Proceedings of the 17th European conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Reykjavík, Iceland (pp. 1-6), 2019.
4- H.K. Engin, E.G. Septanika, and R.B.J. Brinkgreve, “Estimation of pile group behavior using embedded piles,” In Proceeding of the 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics, Goa, India (pp. 3231-8), 2008.
5- A. Truty, “Nonlocal FEM modeling of piles as beam elements embedded within 3D continuum,” Engineering Structures, 277, 115460, 2023.
6- B. Ukritchon, J.C. Faustino, and S. Keawsawasvong, “Numerical investigations of pile load distribution in pile group foundation subjected to vertical load and large moment,” Geomech. Eng, 10(5), 577-598, 2016.
7- R.M.S. Al-Ne’aimi, and K.Q. Hussein, “Numerical study of pile raft foundation behavior under vertical loads and large moments,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 42(1), 97-119, 2024.
8- P. Deb, and S.K. Pal, “Evolution of Piled Raft Foundation at Static Loading Condition and Application of Numerical Modelling: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1-37, 2024.
9- Q.A.R.P. Sumarsono, “Comparative Analysis of Single Pile with Embedded Beam Row and Volume Pile Modeling under Seismic Load,” Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 45(1), 28-40, 2023.
10-A.N. Granitzer, and F. Tschuchnigg, “Practice-oriented validation of embedded beam formulations in geotechnical engineering,” Processes, 9(10), 1739, 2021.
11- T. Schanz, P.A. Vermeer, and P.G. Bonnier, “The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification,” in Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics, 1999, pp. 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315138206.
12- M.S.A. Khan and M. Seyedi, “Dynamic responses of embankment dams, constituted from varied soil types, to seismic activity,” Acadlore Trans. Geosci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177–187, 2023. https://doi.org/10.56578/atg 020305.
13-M. Jasim Khammas Issa, M. Abdelsalam, L. Hashim Khudhair, M. Seyedi, and M.S.A. Khan “Liquefaction Behavior of Suction Bucket Foundations for Wind Turbines Under Soil Variability,” Geotech Geol Eng 43, 177, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-025-03129-8
14- https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/