1- Tomasello, G., and Dominica Porcino, D., 2023,
Earthquake-induced large deformations and failure mechanisms of silty sands in sloped ground conditions,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,
173, 108056.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108056
2- Kazaz I., Hakkı Bilge I., and Gurbuz, M., 2023,
Near-fault ground motion characteristics and its effects on a collapsed reinforced concrete structure in Hatay during the February 6, 2023 Mw7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake,
Engineering Structures, 298, 117067.
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117067
3- Tena-Colunga, A., 2021,
Conditions of structural irregularity. Relationships with observed earthquake damage in Mexico City in 2017,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 143, 106630.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106630
4- Hooda, Y., and Derit Singh, H., 2023,
Vulnerability assessment of an existing hospital structure towards earthquake in New Delhi, India: A case study, materials today proceeding,
In Press, Corrected Proof.
doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.297
5- Mercimek, O., 2023,
Seismic failure modes of masonry structures exposed to Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and 7.6) on February 6, 2023,
Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107422.
doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107422
6- Moradnezhad, F., Zeinoddini, M., Fanaie, N., Moghaddam, Hassan , Khanmohammadi, M. , Zandi, A. P., Hussaini, S. A., Rezaeinejad, H., and Kazemzadeh, O., 2022,
A novel ductile CHS knee bracing system for rehabilitation of earthquake-damaged buildings: The case of Sarpol-e-Zahab (Iran) earthquake,
Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105748.
doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105748
7- Hassanzadeh, R., 2019,
Earthquake population loss estimation using spatial modelling and survey data: The Bam earthquake, 2003, Iran.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 421-435.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.023
8- Mahood, M., and Hamzehloo, H., 2011,
Variation of intrinsic and scattering attenuation of seismic waves with depth in the Bam region, East-Central Iran,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(10) , 1338-1346.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.010
10- Towhata, I., 2022,
Summary of geotechnical activities in response to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake; follow-up of my TC203 Ishihara Lecture in 2019,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 164, 107640.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107640
11- Zhao, H., Qian, X. Y., and Zhu, Y. J., 2023,
Seismic behaviour of post-earthquake composite frame structures with different damage levels,
Structures, 58, 105482.
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105482
12- Wang, W., Li, L., and Qu, Z., 2023,
Machine learning-based collapse prediction for post-earthquake damaged RC columns under subsequent earthquakes,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 172, 108036.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108036
13- Liang, J., Li, Y., Huang, H., and Fan, F., 2023,
A new seismic damage assessment method for single-layer spherical reticulated shells based on structural residual displacement under sequential earthquakes,
Structures, 54, 1391-1401.
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.144
14- Isik, E., Avcil, F., Arkan, E., Buyuksarac, A., Izol, R., and Topalan, M., 2023,
Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes.
Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107345.
doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107345
15- Zhongsheng, L., Bo, Z., Yunsheng, Y., and Shiming, L., 2023,
Preliminary research on the damage to ancient buildings and cultural relics caused by the 1927 Gulang M 8.0 earthquake, Northwest China,
Natural Hazards Research, Available online 25 July 2023,
In Press, Journal Pre-proof.
doi:10.1016/j.nhres.2023.07.002
16- Ince, O., 2023,
Structural damage assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Adıyaman after Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) Earthquakes on 6 February 2023,
Engineering Failure Analysis, 107799.
doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107799
17- Khanmohammadi, M., Eshraghi, M., Sayadi S., Ghafarian, and Mashhadinezhad. M. 2023,
Post-earthquake seismic assessment of residential buildings following Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake (Mw7.3)-part 1: Damage types and damage states,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173, 108121.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108121
18- Khanmohammadi, M., Eshraghi, M., Sayadi, S., Ghafarian, and Mashhadinezhad, M., 2023,
Post-earthquake seismic assessment of residential buildings following Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake (Mw7.3)-Part 2: Seismic vulnerability curves using quantitative damage index,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173, 108120.
doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108120
19- Zhao, H., Qian, X. Y., and Zhu, Y. J., 2023,
Seismic behaviour of post-earthquake composite frame structures with different damage levels,
Structures, 58, 105482.
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105482
20- Zhang, Z. W., Bai, G. L., Qin, C. G., Li, J. R., and Liu, H. Q., 2022,
Shaking table test of fabricated concrete shear wall structure and study on damage mechanism of strong earthquake,
Structures, 43, 645-656.
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.073
21- Song, L., Shen, J., Tang, L., Hu, W., Lu, N., and Nie, X., 2023, T
he magnitude 6.1 earthquake at the border between China and Kazakhstan on December 1st, 2003, and its seismic damage characteristics, Natural Hazards Research, Available online 22 August 2023,
In Press, Journal Pre-proof.
doi:10.1016/j.nhres.2023.08.003
22- Khalil, N., Nizam Kamaruzzaman, S., Baharum, M. R., 2016,
Ranking the indicators of building performance and the users’ risk via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Case of Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 71, 567-576.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.032
23- Pingping. Z., Zuraini, M. D. A., and Yahaya, A., 2023,
Developing indicators for sustainable urban regeneration in historic urban areas: Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Sustainable Cities and Society,
99, 104990.
doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104990
24- Iaria, J., and Susca, T., 2023,
Analytic Hierarchy Processes (AHP) evaluation of green roof- and green wall-based UHI mitigation strategies via ENVI-met simulations,
Urban Climate,
46, 101293.
doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101293
25- Lu, Y., Ge, Y., Zhang, G., Abdulwahab, A., Salameh, A. A., Elhosiny Ali, H., and Nguyen Le, B., 2023,
Evaluation of waste management and energy saving for sustainable green building through analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network model,
Chemosphere, 318, 137708.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137708
26- Zhao, P., Md Ali, Z., and Ahmad, Y., 2023,
Developing indicators for sustainable urban regeneration in historic urban areas: Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),
Sustainable Cities and Society,
99, 104990.
doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104990
27- Mohd Yunus, R., Samadi, Z., Mohd Yusop, N., and Omar, D., 2013,
Expert Choice for Ranking Heritage Streets, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,
101, 465-475.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.220
28- Khalil, N., Nizam Kamaruzzaman, S., and Baharum, M. R., 2016,
Ranking the indicators of building performance and the users’ risk via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Case of Malaysia,
Ecological Indicators,
71, 567-576.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.032
29- Bitarafan, M., Hashemkhani, S., Zolfani, S. L. Arefi, and Zavadskas, E. K., 2012,
Evaluating the construction methods of cold-formed steel structures in reconstructing the areas damaged in natural crises, using the methods AHP and COPRAS-G,
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 12(3), 360-367.
doi:10.1016/j.acme.2012.06.015
30- Iaria, J., and Susca, T., 2023,
Analytic Hierarchy Processes (AHP) evaluation of green roof- and green wall- based UHI mitigation strategies via ENVI-met simulations,
Urban Climate,
46, 101293.
doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101293
31- Raja Shekar, P., and Mathew, A., 2023,
Assessing groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites in the monsoon-fed Murredu river basin, India: An integrated approach using GIS, AHP, and Fuzzy-AHP,
Groundwater for Sustainable Development,
23, 100994.
doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100994
32- Christmann, A., and Van Aelst, S., 2006,
Robust estimation of Cronbach's alpha,
Multivariate Analysis, 97(7), 1660-1674.
doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2005.05.012
33- U. E. T Lam, R., 2010,
Scrutiny of variance results for outliers: Cochran's test optimized,
Analytica Chimica Acta,
659(1–2), 68-84.
doi:10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.032
