Numerical Investigation on Toggled Actuator Forces in Active Vibration Control System

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Structural Engineering, Depaertment of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.

2 Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

In this paper a numerical investigation of installation of actuator in a toggle configuration for decreasing of active control forces in engineering structures has been carried out. During the past two decades, researchers have been focused to prevent the vibration of tall building from strong earthquakes. For achieving this purpose, they applied either massive conventional bracing or passive energy dissipation dampers. Subsequently, they developed active control systems in structures to resist against the high seismic loads. However, this later method eventuates installing massive actuators in building which are not only very costly and uneconomically but also needs large electricity power. In this research, using by known earthquakes, investigation of the effects of the toggle configuration on actuator forces has been performed numerically. For numerical investigation, active tendon control system was selected as a comparison. The numerical investigation shows significant reduction in actuator forces through using toggle configuration. Finally, comparing results through the numerical processe express high matching that relies on mitigation of control forces in the toggled active model.

Keywords


1.Xu, Y. L., Teng, J., (2002). Optimum design of active/passive control devices for tall buildings under earthquake excitation. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 11(2),109-127.

2.Yang, J.,  Soong, T., (1988). Recent advances in active control of civil engineering structures. Probabilistic engineering mechanics, 3(4), p. 179-188.

3.Soong, T.,  (1988). State-of-the-art review: Active structural control in civil engineering. Engineering Structures, 10(2), p. 74-84.

4. Housner, G. W.,  Bergman, L. A., Caughey, T. K., Chassiakos, A. G., Claus, R. O., Masri, S. F., Skelton, R. E., Soong,T. T., Spencer, B. F. J., Yao, T. P., (1997). Structural control: past, present, and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123(9),  897-971.

5. Spencer Jr. B., Nagarajaiah, S., (2003). State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(7), 845-856.

6. Cheng, F. Y., Jiang, H., Lou, K., (2010). Smart structures: Innovative systems for seismic response control. CRC Press.

7. Wu, B., Ou, J. P., Soong,T. T., (1997). Optimal placement of energy dissipation devices for three-dimensional structures. Engineering Structures, 19(2), 113-125.

8.Spencer Jr. B., Sain, M. K., (1997). Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback. Control Systems, IEEE, 17(6), 19-35.

9. Yamazaki, S., Nagata, N.,  Abiru, H., (1992). Tuned active dampers installed in the Minato Mirai (MM) 21 landmark tower in Yokohama. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 43(1), 1937-1948.

10. Cao, H., Reinhorn, A. M.,  Soong, T. T., (1998). Design of an active mass damper for a tall TV tower in Nanjing, China. Engineering Structures,  20(3), 134-143.

11. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T., Tamura, Y., (1999). Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications. Wind and Structures, 2(3), 201-251.

12. Ikeda, Y., Sasaki, K., Sakamoto, M., Kobori, T., (2001). Active mass driver system as the first application of active structural control. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 30(11), 1575-1595.

13. Yamamoto, M., Aizawa, S., Higashino, M., Toyama, K., (2001). Practical applications of active mass dampers with hydraulic actuator. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(11), 1697-1717.

14. Ricciardelli, F., Pizzimenti, A. D., Mattei, M., (2003). Passive and active mass damper control of the response of tall buildings to wind gustiness. Engineering Structures, 25(9), 1199-1209.

15. Park, W., Soon Park, K., Moo Koh, H., Ho Ha, D., (2006). Wind-induced response control and serviceability improvement of an air traffic control tower. Engineering Structures, 28(7), 1060-1070.

16. Abe, M.,  Fujino, Y., (1994). Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 23(8), 813-835.

17. Amini, F., and Tavassoli, M. R., (2005). Optimal structural active control force, number and placement of controllers. Engineering Structures, 27(9),  1306-1316.

18. Liu, D. K., Yang, Y. L., Li, Q. S., (2003). Optimum positioning of actuators in tall buildings using genetic algorithm. Computers & Structures, 81(32), 2823-2827.

19. Park, W., Park, K. S., Koh, H. M., (2008). Active control of large structures using a bilinear pole-shifting transform with control method. Engineering Structures, 30(11), 3336-3344.

20. Pantelides, C. P., Cheng, F. Y., (1990). Optimal placement of controllers for seismic structures. Engineering Structures, 12(4), 254-262.

21. Cheng, F. Y., (1988). Response Control Based on Structural Optimization and its Combination with Active Protection. In Proceeding of 9th World conference in Earthquake engineering, IAEE, Tokyo, 3, 471.

22.Rama Mohan Rao, A.,  Sivasubramanian, K., (2008). Optimal placement of actuators for active vibration control of seismic excited tall buildings using a multiple start guided neighbourhood search (MSGNS) algorithm. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 311(1-2), 133-159.

23. Soong, T. T., Dargush, G. F., (1997). Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. Wiley.

24. Council, B. S. S., (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.

25. Constantinou, M. C., Symans, M., (1992). Experimental and analytical investigation of seismic response of structures with supplemental fluid viscous dampers. National Center for earthquake engineering research.

26. Hwang, S. J., Huang, Y. N. Y., Hung, H., J. C., (2004). Applicability of seismic protective systems to structures with vibration-sensitive equipment. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(11), 1676-1684.

27. Reinhorn, A. M., Viti, S., Cimellaro, G., (2005). Retrofit of structures: Strength reduction with damping enhancement. in Proceedings of the 37th UJNR panel meeting on wind and seismic effects.

28. Soong, T., Spencer, B., (2002). Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures, 24(3), 243-259.

29. Constantinou, M. C., Tsopelas, P., Hammel, W.,  Sigaher Ani, N., (2001). Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(2), 105-112.

30.Sigaher, A. N., Constantinou, M. C., (2003). Scissor-jack-damper energy dissipation system. Earthquake Spectra, 19(1), 133-158.

31.Hwang, J. S., Huang, Y. N., Hung, Y. H., (2005). Analytical and experimental study of toggle-brace-damper systems. Journal of structural engineering, 131(7), 1035-1043.

32. Chung, L., Reinhorn, A., Soong, T., (1988). Experiments on active control of seismic structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114(2), 241-256.

33. Chung, L. L., Lin, R. C., Soong, T. T., Reinhorn, A. M., (1989). Experimental study of active control for MDOF seismic structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 115(8), 1609-1627.

34.Cheng, F. Y., Jiang, H., (1998). Optimum control of a hybrid system for seismic excitations with state observer technique. Smart materials and structures, 7(5), 654.

35. Cheng, F. Y., Jiang, H., (1998). Hybrid control of seismic structures with optimal placement of control devices. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 11(2), 52-58.

36. Chopra, A. K., (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2, Prentice Hall Saddle River, eNY NY.

37. Dyke, S. J., Quast, P., Sain,M. K., Soong, T. T., (1994). Absolute acceleration feedback control strategies for the active mass driver. in Proc. First World Conference on Structural Control.

38. Dyke, S. J., Spencer, B. F. Jr., Quast, P., Sain, M. K., Kaspari, D. C. Jr., Soong,T. T., (1994). Experimental verification of acceleration feedback control strategies for an active tendon system. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

39. Dyke, S. J., Quast, P., Sain,M. K., Soong, T. T., (1996). Acceleration feedback control of MDOF structures. Journal of engineering mechanics, 122(9), 907-918.

40. Dyke, S. J., Quast, P., Sain,M. K., Soong, T. T., (1996). Implementation of an active mass driver using acceleration feedback control. Computerā€Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(5), 305-323.

41. Spencer Jr. B. F., Quast, P., Dyke, S. J.,  Sain, M. K., (1994). Digital Signal ProcessingTechniques for Active Structural Control. Procceeding of the 1994 ASCE Structures Congress,Atlanta, Georgia.