Frequency Dependency of Laboratory Measurement of Maximum Shear Wave Velocity by Bender Elements

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. of Geotechnical Engineering,College of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Maximum shear wave velocity is one of the most important dynamic parameters of soils which contributes in estimating the dynamic behaviour of soils through the maximum shear modulus. There are different methods for measuring shear wave velocity either in laboratory or in the field. One of the laboratory methods that recently has become popular due to its simplicity, is use of Bender Elements in soil samples. Contrary to its simplicity, it has several uncertainties in its data interpretation. Frequency at which the shear wave velocity is measured is one of the effective parameters that significantly affects the clearance of received wave. This article presents results from a laboratory investigation into the shear wave velocity measurement of remolded specimens of Firoozkooh sand. Specimens were subjected to 13 different levels of frequency and 11 different levels of confining pressure. Results shows that by increasing the confining pressure, the frequency at which the received wave has the best clearance, increases. It also shows that frequency dependence of soils increases by increasing the confining pressure.

Keywords


1. Shirley, D. J. and Hampton, L. D., (1978). Shear-wave measurements in laboratory sediments, Journal of Acoustic, Soc. Am., Vol. 63, No. 2, 607–613.

2. Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R. and Lo Presti, D., (1995). Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays, in Pre-failure deformation of geomaterials. Proceedings of the international symposium, 12-14 September, SAPPORO, JAPAN. 2 Vols.

3. Lee, C., Truong, Q. H. and Lee, J. S., (2010). Cementation and bond degradation of rubber-sand mixtures, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.47, No.7, 763–774.

4. Duttine, Benedetto, A. H. D., Bang, D. P. V. and Ezaoui, A., (2007). Anisotropic small strain elastic properties of sands and mixture of sand-clay measured by dynamic and static methods, Soils and Foundations, Vol.47, No.3, 457–472.

5. Dyvik, R. and Madshus, C., (1985). Lab Measurements of Gmax Using Bender Elements, in Advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions, 186–196.

6. Bates, C., (1989). Dynamic soil property measurements during triaxial testing, Géotechnique, Vol.39, No.4, 12-20.

7. Viggiani, G. and Atkinson, J., (1995). Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains, Géotechnique, Vol.45, No.2, 249–265.

8. Jovičić, V. Coop, M. and Simić, M., (1996). Objective criteria for determining G max from bender element tests, Geotechnique, Vol.46, No.2, 357–362.

9. Nash, D. F. D., Pennington, S. and Lings, M. L., (2001). Horizontally mounted bender elements for measuring anisotropic shear moduli in triaxial clay specimens.

10. Kramer, S. L., (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education India.

11. Lee, J. S. and Santamarina, J. C., (2005). Bender elements: performance and signal interpretation, Journal of  Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.131, No.9, 1063–1070.

12. Kokusho, T., (1987). In-situ dynamic soil properties and their evaluations, in Proc. 8th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.

13. Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K. and Yasuda, S., (1978). A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan, in Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Microzonation, 885–896.